| Item | Description | Resolution |
|---|---|---|
| PART 1 - PUBLIC | ||
| AP2 13/001 |
Declarations of interest. |
There were no declarations of interest made in accordance with the Code of Conduct. |
| AP2 13/002 |
Minutes |
RESOLVED: That the Minutes of the meeting held on 12 December 2012 be approved as a correct record and signed by the Chairman. |
| DECISIONS TAKEN UNDER DELEGATED POWERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 3 (OR 2), PART 3 OF THE CONSTITUTION | ||
| AP2 13/003 |
Development Control |
Decisions were taken on the following applications subject to the pre-requisites, informatives, conditions or reasons for refusal set out in the report of the Director of Planning, Transport and Leisure, or in the variations indicated below. Supplementary reports were tabled at the meeting. Members of the public addressed the meeting where the required notice had been given and their comments were taken into account by the Committee when determining the application. Speakers are listed under the relevant planning application shown below. |
| AP2 13/004 |
TM/12/01819/FL - Hookwood Farm, Puttenden Road, Shipbourne |
WITHDRAWN from the agenda. |
| AP2 13/005 |
TM/12/02634/FL - Mount Farm, Borough Green Road, Ightham |
Stationing of a mobile home for a temporary period of 3 years at Mount Farm, Borough Green Road, Ightham. RESOLVED: That the application be APPROVED in accordance with the submitted details, conditions, reasons and informatives set out in the report of the Director of Planning, Transport and Leisure. [Speaker: Mr N Connell - applicant] |
| AP2 13/006 |
TM/12/03325/FL - Rudge, Platt Common, Platt |
Erection of a detached dwelling, new vehicle access and parking arrangement and alterations to the existing dwelling at Rudge, Platt Common, Platt. Local Members made reference to accidents, involving pedestrians and which they considered to have affected the Platt Common/A25 junction in the recent past. Officers noted these concerns and undertook to research the accident history of the junction further with KCC Highways. RESOLVED: That the application be REFUSED for the following reasons: (1) The proposed development, by reason of the siting, size, scale and design of the dwelling responding poorly to its setting, would have a detrimental and harmful impact on the character and visual amenity of Platt Common. The proposal would be contrary to policies CP1, CP13 and CP24 of the Tonbridge and Malling Borough Core Strategy, SQ1 of the Tonbridge and Malling Managing Development and the Environment Development Plan Document and paragraphs 17, 56, 57, 60, 61 and 64 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2012). (2) The proposed development, by reason of the cumulative impact that the development will have on the traffic along Platt Common, would be detrimentally harmful to safety within Platt Common, contrary to Policy CP24 of the Tonbridge and Malling Borough Core Strategy 2007 and Policy SQ8 of the Tonbridge and Malling Managing Development and the Environment Development Plan Document 2010. [Speakers: Mr Baker, member of the public and Mr P Pollock, Platt Common Residents Association] |
| MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION IN PRIVATE | ||
| AP2 13/007 |
Exclusion of Press and Public |
There were no items considered in private. |