Issue - meetings
Revenues and Benefits - Shared Service
Meeting: 11/07/2017 - Council (Item 56)
56 Revenues and Benefits - Shared Service 
PDF 48 KB
Item CB 17/46 referred from Cabinet minutes of 28 June 2017
Additional documents:
- Report of Director of Finance and Transformation, item 56
PDF 82 KB
- Annex 1, item 56
PDF 83 KB
- Annex 2, item 56
PDF 44 KB
Minutes:
Item CB 17/46 referred from Cabinet minutes of 28 June 2017
RESOLVED: That the recommendations at Minute CB 17/46 be approved.
Meeting: 28/06/2017 - Cabinet (Item 46)
46 Revenues and Benefits - Shared Service PDF 42 KB
Additional documents:
- Report of Director of Finance and Transformation, item 46
PDF 82 KB
- Annex 1, item 46
PDF 83 KB
- Annex 2, item 46
PDF 44 KB
Minutes:
Item FIP 17/17 referred from Finance, Innovation and Property Advisory Board minutes of 21 June 2017
The Cabinet received the recommendations of the Finance, Innovation and Property Advisory Board at its meeting on 21 June 2017 concerning IT and digital provision in relation to the implementation of the Shared Service for Revenues and Benefits between the Council and Gravesham Borough Council.
RECOMMENDED: That
(1) the evaluation (assuming costs for a third party phase 2 option) set out at Annex 1 to the report be approved;
(2) the Capital Plan and Revenue Budget be updated accordingly; and
(3) the capital and one-off revenue costs be met from the Transformation Reserve.
*Referred to Council
Meeting: 21/06/2017 - Finance, Innovation and Property Advisory Board (Item 17)
17 Revenues and Benefits - Shared Service PDF 82 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Further to Decision No D170030CAB, the Director of Finance and Transformation reported progress with the implementation of the Shared Service for Revenues and Benefits. Details were given of the project work required in connection with the harmonisation of IT and digital provision between the Council and Gravesham Borough Council, the proposed timescale and “fast track” capital evaluation to enable the work to progress. The report set out the evaluation for phases 1 and 2 of the project while that for phase 3 would be presented to the Advisory Board as soon as it was available. It was noted that in respect of phase 2, “in house” and “third party supplier” options were being considered and details of the functionality considerations were set out at Annex 2 to the report.
RECOMMENDED: That
(1) the evaluation (assuming costs for a third party phase 2 option) set out at Annex 1 to the report be approved;
(2) the Capital Plan and Revenue Budget be updated accordingly; and
(3) the capital and one-off revenue costs be met from the Transformation Reserve.
*Referred to Cabinet