Issue - meetings

Recommendation FRP 24/2 of Finance, Regeneration and Property Scrutiny Select Committee of 12 March 2024 in respect of Phase 2 of the Tonbridge Town Centre Asset Review

Due to their size, the reports previously considered by the Scrutiny Select Committee are not attached as part of this agenda and can be viewed on the public website

Consideration was given to recommendation FRP 24/4 of the Finance, Regeneration and Property Scrutiny Select Committee in respect of the Tonbridge Town Centre Asset Review.

Due regard was given to the detailed reports and assessments provided by the external consultant, Mace, together with the views expressed by the Scrutiny Select Committee. 

It was suggested that the membership of the Town Centre Programme Board be the Cabinet Member for Climate Change, Regeneration and Property, Cabinet Member for Community Services, Councillors Athwal, Bridge, Hood and Mehmet.

RESOLVED: That

(1)            the Phase 2 reports from Mace be noted;

(2)            in order to facilitate efficient and consistent decision making, Officers be instructed to develop terms of reference for a Tonbridge Town Centre Programme Board (as set out in 1.3.6, 1.3.7 and Annex 6) for Cabinet approval and the membership of the Board as above, be noted;

(3)            the Borough Councils general approach to parking should be to provide unallocated parking spaces between the current 970 and anticipated future peak demand, on the grounds that the proposals from Sainsbury PLC and the potential provision of a hotel and medical practice were likely to attract greater numbers to the town;

(4)            options for a podium parking solution with development above, be explored for Angel West car park;

(5)            the Borough Councils general approach to housing should be to focus on low-rise high-density housing types and that any development should maximise affordable housing provision and place the needs of local residents first and should preferably be delivered by a Borough Council owned housing company, subject to further investigation by the Programme Board and more detailed viability work being undertaken;

(6)            options for retail and commercial use around public spaces that provide flexible, simple units to optimise value be explored, and that the Borough Council acts as landlord for any new retail units and ensures that the viability of current commercial businesses are not put at risk by the creation of an alternative shopping centre;

(7)            options for a hotel be included in the project, with the possibility of the Borough Council acting as developer and landlord;

(8)            the inclusion of a GP Practice be supported on the grounds of providing adequate infrastructure for residents and that the Borough Council looks to incorporate this into the redevelopment as landlord;

(9)            the Borough Council should aspire to undertake a master developer role to influence the shape, style and design of the development so that it remains sympathetic to the local area; and the extent and scope of this role be reviewed by the Tonbridge Town Centre Programme Board;

(10)        the Borough Council should explore a collaborative agreement with Network Rail in relation to their train station car park sites and that the Tonbridge Town Centre Programme Board consider whether other stakeholders and/or landowners should be approached;

(11)        the Borough Council should commit to a net zero baseline as a fundamental requirement of the development;

(12)        to guarantee continuity of service for leisure and community users, the Angel Centre should  ...  view the full decision text for item 10.

The report set out options in respect of Phase 2 of the Tonbridge Town Centre asset review and proposed the creation of a Tonbridge Town Centre Programme Board.

·      Annex 3 is available as a supplement to the main agenda due to its size (8320KB); and

·      Annex 7 is attached under Part 2 due to its confidential content

The joint report of the Cabinet and Management Team set out a number of options in respect of Phase 2 of the Tonbridge Town Centre asset review;  proposed the creation of a Tonbridge Town Centre Programme Board and sought views on the strategic direction for how the aims and objectives could be achieved. 

Members noted that Phase 2 was the next step in a long process associated with bringing forward a major town centre redevelopment and welcomed the opportunity to comment on the types of uses that could be considered in the area east of the High Street and on a wide range of matters to help inform the strategic direction the work took in future phases.  Reference was made to the risks associated with progressing a town centre redevelopment scheme especially if there was not a robust governance arrangement in place for taking forward such a large and complex programme of work.  The establishment of a specific Tonbridge Town Centre Programme Board with clear terms of reference was one way of mitigating those risks.  In addition, to ensure that all areas of work were effectively co-ordinated the appointment of a Tonbridge Town Centre Programme Manager was supported.

Careful consideration was given to the detailed reports and assessments provided by the external consultant, Mace, set out in the attached annexes.  There was detailed discussion on a number of significant issues including governance and project management, parking, housing and engagement and consultation with key stakeholders and the public. Due regard was also given to climate change factors, affordable housing for local residents, the financial and value for money implications and local infrastructure.

Members expressed preferences in relation to aspects of the project and a number of recommendations were proposed, seconded and supported.

*RECOMMENDED:  That

(1)             the Phase 2 reports from Mace be noted;

(2)             in order to facilitate efficient and consistent decision making, Officers be instructed to develop terms of reference for a Tonbridge Town Centre Programme Board (as set out in 1.3.6, 1.3.7 and Annex 6) for Cabinet approval;

(3)             on the grounds that the proposals from Sainsbury PLC, the potential provision of a hotel and medical practice were likely to attract greater numbers to the town, the Borough Councils general approach to parking should be to provide unallocated parking spaces between the current 970 and anticipated future peak demand;

(4)             options for a podium parking solution with development above, be explored for Angel West car park;

(5)             the Borough Councils general approach to housing should be to focus on low-rise high-density housing types and any development should maximise affordable housing provision and place the needs of local residents first and should preferably be delivered by a Borough Council owned housing company, subject to further investigation by the Programme Board and more detailed viability work being undertaken;

(6)             options be explored for retail and commercial use around public spaces that provided flexible, simple units to optimise value, with the Borough Council acting as landlord for any new retail units  ...  view the full minutes text for item 4