65 Riverside Route Lighting Project, Tonbridge PDF 176 KB
Consideration of recommendations of the Finance, Regeneration and Property Scrutiny Select Committee in respect of the Riverside Improvement Project in Tonbridge.
Recommendations of the Scrutiny Select Committee are to follow
Additional documents:
Decision:
Cabinet had due regard to the views of the Scrutiny Select Committee, the feasibility study report (Annex 2) and the Capital Plan Evaluation (Annex 1) and welcomed the provision of high-quality lighting for pedestrians, the opportunity to create a safe and secure environment and reduce crime. The lack of lighting, combined with a narrow path lined with trees and shrubbery and unprotected river edge, made this an uninviting section of the route.
Discussions had taken place with Kent County Council Public Rights of Way and it was confirmed that lighting might be installed on the route using powers under s161 of the Public Health Act 1875.
On the grounds of enhancing the area and improving safety of pedestrians, Cllr Mehmet proposed, seconded by Cllr Taylor and Cabinet
RESOLVED: That
(1) Phase 1 of the project be taken forward through the design stages up to and including the preparation of tender documents;
(2) the use of the Borough Council’s powers under s161 of the Public Health Act 1875 for the delivery of the project, with agreement from Kent County Councils Public Rights of Way Team, be authorised; and
(3) arrangement be made for Members to have physical sight of the likely intended lighting columns by means of a demonstration in a low light at a future meeting or a site visit.
*RECOMMENDED: That
(4) the scheme be transferred to List A of the Capital Plan.
*Recommended to Council
Minutes:
(Decision Notice D250054CAB)
Consideration was given to the recommendations of the Finance, Regeneration and Property Scrutiny Select Committee in respect of a List C Capital Plan Evaluation for riverside lighting between Town Lock and Vale Road in Tonbridge. The report sought approval to move the project forward for construction later in the calendar year and requested that Cabinet recommend to Council that the scheme be transferred to List A of the Capital Plan.
Cabinet had due regard to the views of the Scrutiny Select Committee, the feasibility study report (Annex 2) and the Capital Plan Evaluation (Annex 1) and welcomed the provision of high-quality lighting for pedestrians, the opportunity to create a safe and secure environment and reduce crime. The lack of lighting, combined with a narrow path lined with trees and shrubbery and unprotected river edge, made this an uninviting section of the route.
Discussions had taken place with Kent County Council Public Rights of Way and it was confirmed that lighting might be installed on the route using powers under s161 of the Public Health Act 1875.
On the grounds of enhancing the area and improving safety of pedestrians, Cllr Mehmet proposed, seconded by Cllr Taylor and Cabinet
RESOLVED: That
(1) Phase 1 of the project be taken forward through the design stages up to and including the preparation of tender documents;
(2) the use of the Borough Council’s powers under s161 of the Public Health Act 1875 for the delivery of the project, with agreement from Kent County Councils Public Rights of Way Team, be authorised; and
(3) arrangement be made for Members to have physical sight of the likely intended lighting columns by means of a demonstration in a low light at a future meeting or a site visit.
*RECOMMENDED: That
(4) the scheme be transferred to List A of the Capital Plan.
*Recommended to Council
11 Riverside Route Lighting Project, Tonbridge PDF 243 KB
This report brings forward a List C Capital Plan Evaluation for the Riverside Route Lighting project between Town Lock and Vale Road, Tonbridge and seeks approval to move the project forward for construction later in this calendar year.
Due to its size the Stage 2 Lighting Feasibility Study (Annex 2) is published as a supplement.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The report brought forward a List C Capital Plan Evaluation for riverside lighting between Town Lock and Vale Road in Tonbridge and sought approval to move the project forward for construction later in the calendar year.
Members considered the feasibility study report (Annex 2) and the Capital Plan Evaluation (Annex 1) and welcomed the provision of high-quality lighting for pedestrians and the opportunity to create a safe and secure environment and reduce crime. The lack of lighting, combined with a narrow path lined with trees and shrubbery and unprotected river edge, made this an uninviting area and there had been a long-term aspiration from successive Ward Members to improve safety along this section of the riverside route.
Discussions had taken place with Kent County Council Public Rights of Way and it was confirmed that lighting may be installed on the route using powers under s161 of the Public Health Act 1875.
The Committee was assured that lighting levels would be consistent but would be low to protect and maintain the environment for wildlife, such as bats. The feasibility study provided a guide that developers should follow. In addition, comments from Kent Police would be reflected in the scheme.
On the grounds of understanding whether the introduction of a lighting scheme would impact local residents, Cllr Rhodes proposed that Members should have physical sight of the likely intended lighting columns by means of a demonstration in a low light at a future meeting of the Committee. This was seconded by Cllr Cannon and supported by the majority of Members.
Subsequent to the vote and for reasons of practicality it was agreed that a future meeting of the Committee could mean a visit to the project site.
*RECOMMENDED: That
(1) Phase 1 of the project be taken forward through the design stages up to and including the preparation of tender documents;
(2) the scheme be transferred to List A of the Capital Plan;
(3) the use of the Borough Council’s powers under s161 of the Public Health Act 175 for the delivery of the project, with agreement from Kent County Councils Public Rights of Way Team, be authorised; and
(4) Members had physical sight of the likely intended lighting columns by means of a demonstration in a low light at a future meeting or a site visit.
*Recommended to Cabinet – Council Decision