Issue - meetings

Consideration of the recommendations of Cabinet in respect of Setting the Budget 2026/27.

Due to the timescales and print deadlines, the recommendations of the meeting of Cabinet held on 10 February 2026 will be circulated to Members in advance of the meeting of Council.

In accordance with CPR 8.5 of the Constitution there will be a recorded vote for this item.

Further to the meeting of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee earlier in the cycle, this report updates Cabinet on issues relating to the Medium-Term Financial Strategy.  It also takes Members through the necessary procedures in order to set the Budget for 2026/27.

Members are asked to note that at the time of writing this report, the final settlement has not been received.  All figures contained in the report are based on the provisional settlement.

Further to the reports to the Overview and Scrutiny Committee earlier in the cycle the joint report of the Chief Executive, the Head of Finance, the Leader and Cabinet Member for Finance, Waste and Technical Services updated the Cabinet on issues relating to the Medium Term Financial Strategy (MTFS) and gave details of the necessary procedures to be followed in order to set the budget for 2026/27.

Members noted that at the time of publishing the report the final settlement had not been confirmed and all figures contained in the report were based on the provisional local government settlement.  Whilst the settlement for 2026/27 was better than expected within the MTFS there was an overall funding decrease on the notional equivalent funding for 2025/26 of £182,000 (2%). This decrease continued with further reductions of £335,000 (3.7%) and £378,000 (4.4%) in the 2027/28 and 2028/29 financial years respectively.  This meant that in 2028/29 the Borough Council would receive reduced grant of £895,000 (9.8%) compared to the notional amount for 2025/26.

Since the publication of the report, the Head of Finance advised that the final local government finance settlement had been confirmed.  Whilst there was no fundamental impact on the proposed budget for 2026/27, there would be a reduction of £173,000 in 2027/28 resulting in a change to the General Revenue Reserve which would reduce to £4.6M (from £4.8M).

However, as the provisional settlement was better than the prudent approach taken in the MTFS this allowed additional funds to be targeted to key priorities, such as the regeneration of the Tonbridge Town Centre.

In addition, the Business Rates Reset had resulted in previous gains being eliminated from the baseline settlement.  There were a number of properties awaiting valuation by the Valuation Office that could give additional growth above the current baseline level.

Referendum principles meant that council tax could only rise by greater than 3% of £5.  A 3% increase in the Borough Council element of the council tax bill represented a council tax at Band D for 2026/27 of £252.65 a cash increase of £7.35 per annum.

Allowing for the issues summarised above, and detailed in the report, the Funding Gap had reduced to zero over the medium-term but was dependent on committed savings of £200,000 in relation to office accommodation, £200,000 costs in relation to temporary accommodation and £400,000 service fee income from the Leisure Trust.

Finally, it was recommended that six schemes be added to the Capital Plan 2026/27.

Due regard was given to the financial and value for money considerations, the assessment of risk and the legal implications.  Whilst the uncertainty surrounding local government finances had reduced, issues around longer-term funding could give rise to further funding gaps in later years. The impact of current economic conditions, such as inflation and interest rates, were difficult to predict and made financial planning challenging.

In recognition that the Borough Council was required to set a budget and the proposals presented best value for money, Cllr Boughton proposed, Cllr Taylor seconded  ...  view the full minutes text for item 19