Agenda and minutes

Licensing and Appeals Panel - Friday, 10th September, 2021 11.30 am

Venue: Civic Suite, Gibson Building, Kings Hill, West Malling

Contact: Democratic Services  Email: committee.services@tmbc.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

PART 1 - PUBLIC

LAP 21/22

Declarations of Interest

Minutes:

There were no declarations of interest made in accordance with the Code of Conduct.

LAP 21/23

Exclusion of Press and Public pdf icon PDF 4 KB

The Chairman to move that the press and public be excluded from the remainder of the meeting during consideration of any items the publication of which would disclose exempt information

Minutes:

The Chairman moved, it was seconded and

 

RESOLVED:  That as public discussion would disclose exempt information, the following matters be considered in private.

PART 2 - PRIVATE

Decisions taken under Delegated Powers in accordance with paragraph 3, Part 3 of the Constitution

LAP 21/24

Review of Private Hire Driver's Licence - Case No. 05/2021

The Panel is invited to consider what action should be taken in respect of a Private Hire Driver’s Licence.

Minutes:

(Reasons: LGA 1972 Sch 12A Paragraph 1 – Information relating to any individual)

 

The Licensing and Appeals Committee, sitting as a Panel was asked to consider what action should be taken in respect of the holder of a Private Hire Vehicle Driver’s licence after a DVLA driver’s licence check had shown that penalty points had been awarded in 2019 for a CU80 driver offence – using a hand held mobile device whilst driving a motor vehicle on a road.

 

The Panel had regard to the report of the Director of Central Services and Deputy Chief Executive, the application form completed by the Driver for the renewal of a Private Hire Driver’s licence and the DVLA Licence summary dated 18 March 2021 showing one endorsement for 6 penalty points, dated 23 June 2019 for “CU80 Breach of requirements as to control of the vehicle, mobile telephone etc”.  

 

In addition, the Panel had regard to the TMBC Licensing Policy 2018-2023 with particular reference to:

a.       Licensing of Drivers and Vehicles - 1.4.4 – Public Safety is paramount when processing prospective candidate.

b.       Previous Convictions 12.13.1 – listed offences will be treated as major traffic offences if the court awarded 4 or more penalty points for the offence.

 

c.       Previous Convictions 12.9.2 – an isolated conviction for an offence… will require careful consideration of the facts and will at the very least merit a warning as to future driving… Where [a] conviction is within 6 months prior to the application the application will normally be refused.

 

d.       Previous Convictions 12.14.1 – where an applicant has a conviction for using a hand-held mobile telephone or hand-held device whilst driving, a licence will not be granted until at least five years have elapsed since the conviction nor completion of any sentence or driving ban imposed.

 

e.       Private Hire Drivers conditions 14.1.21 – Drivers must not use a mobile phone whilst driving unless it is designed for hands-free operation.

 

f.         Penalty Points system P20 – failure to notify the Council of any amendment to the details of DVLA licence (change of personal details or points being given). 

 

The Applicant failed to attend the Hearing.  The Panel decided to proceed in his absence as the applicant had failed to respond to communications from the Licensing team on a number of occasions.  The facts were considered to be straightforward and the Panel did not feel it needed to hear from the Applicant.

 

The Panel reviewed the papers submitted.  The Applicant had received 6 penalty points on his licence for using a mobile telephone whilst driving.  Whilst the Applicant had been dealt with at the roadside by the Police, the Panel considered that the relevant policy provisions with regard to previous convictions would apply.  The Applicant admitted that he had been seen driving whilst on a mobile telephone and had accepted the penalty points. 

 

The Panel considered that public safety was a paramount consideration and the Applicant’s actions had endangered the public whilst driving.  This fell well below the  ...  view the full minutes text for item LAP 21/24