Agenda and minutes

Licensing and Appeals Panel - Wednesday, 18th November, 2015 12.00 pm

Venue: Civic Suite, Gibson Building, Kings Hill, West Malling

Contact: Committee Services  Email: committee.services@tmbc.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

PART 1 - PUBLIC

LA 15/105

Declarations of Interest

Minutes:

There were no declarations of interest made in accordance with the Code of Conduct.

LA 15/106

Exclusion of Press and Public pdf icon PDF 28 KB

The Chairman to move that the press and public be excluded from the remainder of the meeting during consideration of any items the publication of which would disclose exempt information

Minutes:

The Chairman moved, it was seconded and

 

RESOLVED:  That as public discussion would disclose exempt information, the following matters be considered in private.

PART 2 - PRIVATE

Decisions taken under Delegated Powers in accordance with Paragraph 3, Part 3 of the Constitution

LA 15/107

Review of Private Hire Operator and Private Hire Driver's Licences - Case No 22/2015

(Reason: LGA 1972 Sch 12A Paragraph 1 – Information relating to an individual)

Minutes:

(Reason: LGA 1972 Sch 12A Paragraph 1 – Information relating to an individual)

 

The Panel was invited to consider whether there were grounds for the suspension or revocation of Private Hire Operator’s Licence Number 13/00770/OPER following investigations into his practices as a Private Hire Operator.  The Panel was asked to consider multiple non-compliances with the requirements of the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976 (“the 1976 Act”) and breaches of the Tonbridge & Malling Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Policy in respect to what is required of a person holding a Private Hire Operator Licence. 

 

In addition, the Panel was asked to consider whether the Operator, who also held a Private Hire Driver’s Licence (Badge Number 491) remained a fit and proper person to hold that licence. 

The Panel listened carefully to the representations made by the Operator/Driver, had regard to the report of the Director of Central Services and made the following findings in respect to the Private Hire Operators Licence 13/00770/OPER:–

 

1.            The Panel noted the requirements of the Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Licensing Policy in relation to the requirements placed upon Private Hire Operators.

 

2.            The Panel was very concerned at the clear failure, through the information given and Operator’s own evidence, to keep any records, as required by s.56(2), and s.56(3) of the 1976 Act.  This failure was itself sufficient to warrant a revocation of the Private Hire Operator’s Licence under s.62(1)(a) of the 1976 Act.

 

3.            In relation to s.62(1)(b) of the 1976 Act, the Panel was also concerned over the Operator’s general conduct and lack of cooperation with the Licensing Authority and its officers and in not adhering to the Private Hire Operators conditions as clearly stated in the Licensing Policy.

 

4.            In relation to s.62(1)(d) of the 1976 Act, the Panel noted that the Operator did not appear to operate as a Private Hire Operator.

 

With regard to the Private Hire Driver’s Licence (Badge Number 491) the Panel made the following findings:–

1.            The Panel noted the requirements of the Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Licensing Policy in relation to Private Hire Drivers.

 

2.            By s.61(1)(a)(ii) of the 1976 Act, a failure to comply with the provisions of the 1976 Act as they relate to private hire drivers may give reason for the Council to suspend or revoke a Private Hire Driver’s Licence.

 

3.            The Panel noted that, in relation to licensed vehicle, plate number 174, the Driver had failed properly to affix the vehicle plate to the rear of the licensed white Peugeot registration number FY09 CHH, contrary to Section 48(6) of the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976.

 

4.            Furthermore, having been reminded by an authorised officer of the Council that it was both a legal and policy requirement to so affix the plate, the Driver still failed to do so. The Panel noted that a failure to comply with a requirement of an authorised officer of the  ...  view the full minutes text for item LA 15/107